America's Stock-Fund Owners Pay Twice
the Fees of Institutions
2003-11-17 03:53 (New York)
Nov. 17 (Bloomberg) -- Americans who own
stock mutual
funds are charged annual management
fees of about $18 billion,
twice the amount they should be paying
according to data shared
by state and federal regulators
investigating the industry.
Individuals pay $56 in fees for every
$10,000 in equity
mutual funds, double the $28 paid by
institutional investors in
stock funds, said John Freeman, a
professor at the University
of South Carolina and one of the
principle sources of data on
mutual funds for New York State
Attorney General Eliot Spitzer.
Mutual funds ``charge whatever they can
get away with and
nobody has been stopping them,''
Freeman said in an interview
from his office in Columbia, South
Carolina.
Individuals should be paying similar
levels of fees as
institutional investors, according to Spitzer,
who initiated
the investigation of the $7 trillion
mutual-fund industry in
September. Spitzer alleges improper
short-term trading of
mutual funds helped push up costs for
America's 84 million
owners of stock funds, whose
investments are worth $3.2
trillion according to the Investment
Company Institute. An
absence of transparency on fees has
helped disguise the extent
of the wrongdoing, Spitzer said.
``Many funds have abandoned the interests
of
shareholders,'' Spitzer said in a
statement to Bloomberg News.
Stock, bond and money market mutual funds
have more assets
than the $5.9 trillion in public and
private pension funds
combined, and the amount of work
involved in overseeing the
different accounts is similar, making
it impossible to justify
the fee differential, Spitzer said.
Criticism of SEC
On Nov. 13, Spitzer criticized the
Securities and Exchange
Commission's partial settlement in its
inquiry of Putnam
Investments because it didn't require
the company to admit
guilt. It also didn't address fees
charged by equity mutual
funds, which were mostly introduced
during the bull market of
the late 1990s when commissions were
overshadowed by 24 percent
annual returns of the Standard &
Poor's 500 Index.
Boston-based Putnam has been charging
individual owners of
its International Capital Opportunities
mutual fund $91 per
$10,000 invested. The state of
Massachusetts was asked to pay
$27 per $10,000 invested in international
stocks.
``Lowering fees is inevitable,'' said
William Patterson, a
director of investment at the AFL-CIO,
which represents 65
labor unions with 13.2 million members.
``This is all to the
good. This is an industry which had a
pass for many years.''
The SEC, along with Spitzer and other
state regulators, is
examining whether returns for long-term
investors have been
reduced by improper short-term and
after-hours trading by
privileged clients. Companies being
probed include Putnam, New
York-based Alliance Capital Management
Holding LP, Strong
Capital Management Inc. of Menomonee
Falls, Wisconsin, and
Denver's Janus Capital Group Inc.
Firings, Suspensions
Disclosures of improper trading have led
to the firing or
suspension of more than 40 employees at
companies including
Bank of America Corp. and Prudential
Securities Inc., and the
ousting of senior executives such as
Lawrence Lasser, who
oversaw Putnam for 18 years. Alliance
asked for the resignation
of John Carifa, the firm's president
for 10 years, for
overseeing a unit that engaged in
inappropriate trading. On
Nov. 13, Gary Pilgrim and Harold
Baxter, who co-founded Pilgrim
Baxter & Associates Ltd. in 1982,
were forced to step down.
So far, there's little evidence of
investors abandoning
stock funds. An estimated $5.4 billion
per week poured into
equity funds in the four-week period
ended Nov. 12, a survey by
AMG Data Services of Arcata,
California, said. The pace of
inflows was the fastest since May 2001,
following a 19 percent
increase in the S&P 500 Index this
year.
Greater Disclosure
Lawmakers including Democratic Senators
Jon Corzine and
Christopher Dodd, and Republican
Senator Peter Fitzgerald and
Representative Richard Baker, are
pushing for legislation
requiring fund companies to more
clearly disclose the
commissions that they charge.
``If you really look at the fee structure
of the industry,
you'll see that the fees are very
high,'' Fitzgerald said at a
Senate subcommittee hearing on Nov. 3.
``We need to fix that.''
Fund companies respond that management
fees they charge
include more services, like sending
reports to shareholders,
than those charged for pension-fund
management.
``The advisory fee includes a bundle of
services so you
can't separate out the portfolio
management fee that pension
funds pay,'' said John Rea, chief
economist at the Investment
Company Institute in Washington, the
mutual-fund industry's
trade association.
Federated
Charges
Commissions charged by the 25 biggest
mutual fund managers
showed that Pittsburgh-based Federated
Investors Inc. has among
the highest fees, collecting an average
$83 for every $10,000
in its equity mutual funds, according
to data compiled by
Bloomberg. Mellon Financial Corp.'s
Dreyfus Funds demands $80.
Average stock fund costs aren't
``particularly
meaningful,'' Federated spokeswoman
Meghan McAndrew said.
Investors use other factors to pick
funds, including analysis
of long-term performance, a money
manager's reputation and how
a particular fund fits into an overall
portfolio, she said.
The average management fee at Amvescap's
Aim Investments
unit is about 0.75 percent of assets
invested because a
majority of the firm's stock funds
invest in international,
``small-cap,'' and industry-specific
parts of the market such
as gold and health-care companies, said
spokesman Ivy McLemore.
``The research demands on the fund company
are more
strenuous and labor intensive because
many of the companies in
the funds' portfolios aren't
universally followed by Wall
Street analysts,'' McLemore said.
Lowest Fees
Vanguard Group of Valley Forge,
Pennsylvania, charges the
lowest stock fund fees among the 25
biggest companies -- $27
per $10,000 invested, according to
Bloomberg data. The
management company is owned by
shareholders, unlike most of its
competitors, allowing for lower
expenses, said Michael Miller,
managing director for planning and
development at Vanguard.
``Small differences in the fees charged
can add up to
enormous differences in returns over
time,'' Fitzgerald, a
senator from Illinois, told reporters
on Nov. 3. ``A basis
point here, a basis point there, may
not sound like much, but
when it's multiplied by someone's
entire life savings and then
compounded over 10, 20, or 30 years it
can add up to an
enormous difference. Investors need to
spend some time to try
to search out the lowest-cost,
best-managed funds.''
Fitzgerald said lawmakers may draw up legislation to
limit
mutual-fund fees. ``We haven't fully
thought that through,'' he
said. ``It's something that we've got
to consider.''
A proposal from Spitzer that mutual funds
put clauses in
contracts with advisory and management
companies to prevent the
managers from charging fees above those
charged to pension
funds would make ``a whole lot of
sense, Fitzgerald said.
``If investors feel the game is rigged,
they will avoid
the playing field and park their money
on the sidelines,'' said
Baker, a representative from Louisiana,
in testimony to a
Senate subcommittee on Nov. 3.
--Aaron Pressman in the Boston newsroom
at (1) (617) 338-5822
or apressman@Bloomberg.net, with reporting by
Amy Strahan
Butler in Washington, Philip Boroff and
Margaret Popper in New
York, Richard Craig in Princeton, and
Matthew Keenan and Edward
Baeb in Boston. Editors: Quinson, Roussel, Urban.